By: goggzilla
Marper ruling, well, after my victory (striking out) which was made final in March 2012 we still have no deletion of innocent (2 million odd) DNA samples.
View ArticleBy: David Mead
It’s a concern, but not surprising, that the report details s.4 decs but there is nothing on when and where and why s.3 has been used. The “so far as possible” duty flies under the radar of...
View ArticleBy: Carl Gardner (@carlgardner)
I don’t think a low number of declarations of incompatibility necessarily reflects judicial deference. Remember, once a court has determined that application of a provision breaches human rights, it...
View ArticleBy: unlimitednow
The UK is not a respector of Human RIghts. The Adversarial system, in which the hapless are convicted by laws brought in to purge long established indiviulal rights, causes serious injustice.
View ArticleBy: Super Cyan
‘The UK paid out £454,457 in damages for human rights violations (known as ‘just satisfaction’) in 2011, compared to £371,160 in 2010 (p.58). Fear of this figure ending up in the Daily Mail may be the...
View ArticleBy: John Hirst (@Jailhouselawyer)
The Report, in my view, amounts to another example of the dodgy dossier. There is no provision within either European or intnational law for delay in implementation on the grounds advanced by the MoJ:...
View Article
